Pulled directly from a delivered engagement: a language-learning educator with ~600,000 subscribers, 100 videos analyzed, 9,400+ comments from 6,200+ unique participants. Creator and participants are pseudonymized. Every number is real.
This is an excerpt, not a full report. Names are pseudonymized. Metrics shown are the actual figures from a delivered engagement — they illustrate the structure of every report we produce, not "archetypal" or representative numbers. In a real engagement, every quote, score, and recommendation links back to the underlying source evidence — the specific URL, the specific date, the participant's prior engagement history.
Participants appear as @Participant_NNNN. The creator is unnamed.
Health scores, demand counts, conversion percentages: all computed, not illustrative.
[CORE] and [ADVOCATE] are engagement tiers assigned algorithmically across the full participant history.
In delivered reports, every quote and statistic carries a verifiable source link. Removed here for confidentiality.
Health Score is computed from four sub-indices, each scored independently. Fan Concentration is unusually low — strong signal that growth is broad but advocate-thin.
72 product-demand signals detected in the comment history — 49 flagged as explicit purchase intent and 22 as explicit course or structured-learning requests. Viewers aren't asking for more free tutorials. They're independently describing the paid product they would buy. The strongest CORE participant in the dataset wrote an unprompted syllabus for it (second quote below).
"Daily high-quality instruction from either a native or a native-equivalent speaker, focused on activating the language."
@Participant_1847 [CORE] · 24 likes
"As a self-taught language learner, if I could start again I would focus intensively on 10 key verbs. These are the key to everything and unlock the whole language. I would batter them in repeated grammar drills: every tense; every mood."
@Participant_3318 [CORE] · 87 likes
The report surfaces unprompted, high-engagement endorsements already public on the channel. These are not manufactured quotes. They are existing public statements, ranked by social proof weight and aligned to the products the creator is considering.
"I have tried every channel, every app, and every textbook on the market. This is the first place that has actually moved the needle. The clarity is on a different level."
@Participant_4071 [CORE] · 312 likes · pinned by creator
"After six months of these breakdowns I passed my B2 exam on the first try. I owe this channel directly."
@Participant_5512 [ADVOCATE] · 198 likes
Four of the 10 most-invested community participants are currently dormant or measurably decelerating. Their exit pattern tracks to a single named issue: video titles over-promising relative to content. Two CORE participants wrote this criticism publicly; one has since gone silent.
"I am rapidly losing all respect for you" — regarding clickbait titling on methodological content.
@Participant_3318 [CORE] · 24 videos engaged, 59 comments, 424 likes received · silent 30 days
"When will you start giving honest titles to your videos?"
@Participant_2956 [CORE] · velocity −0.4, trend: disengaging
| Participant | Tier | Videos | Likes Received | Status | Final Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advocate_9817 | Superfan | 32 | 233 | Decelerating | Positive |
| Advocate_3318 | Core | 24 | 424 | Dormant · 30d | Critical |
| Advocate_5203 | Core | 11 | 63 | Dormant · 118d | Positive |
| Advocate_2956 | Core | — | — | Disengaging | Critical |
Advocate_5203 went silent after posting an enthusiastic question that received no creator reply — final sentiment remained maximally positive, indicating content-gap dormancy rather than dissatisfaction. The full report includes re-engagement scoring and named triggers per participant.
Demand signals are not evenly distributed. They concentrate around specific videos, formats, and time windows. The full report maps each signal to the source content so the creator can see exactly which videos are driving the highest-quality demand — and what they have in common.
Excerpt from a delivered report. Creator and participants are pseudonymized; statistics are real and were computed from complete population data. The delivered report is 30–50 pages and contains additional sections including content longevity classification, cross-video pattern analysis, sponsorship surface, dormant-fan re-engagement scoring, and a prioritized recommendations queue.
A report is not the deliverable. The deliverable is the decision the report supports. Here is what becomes actionable from the four sections above.
22 participants independently described a course-shaped paid product. Two CORE participants wrote unprompted curriculum specs. Decision: scope the course around their specifications, with their words as the launch copy.
Endorsements with 198–312 likes already exist on the channel. Decision: pull these into the launch page directly, with source URLs, instead of requesting new ones.
Advocate_5203 went silent after a positive question that received no reply. Two CORE participants flagged title clickbait publicly. Decision: a personal re-engagement message to the silent advocates, paired with a titling-policy change before the next upload.
49 explicit purchase-intent signals concentrate around a specific format. Decision: lead the launch with that format. The other 23 product ideas in the catalog wait until validated the same way.
The Deep Community Audit runs the same participant-level analysis on an adjacent or competitor channel and cross-references the two participant pools. Three things become visible:
Shared superfans and what content they respond to on the other channel that you are not making.
Untapped audience segments on the adjacent channel that match your viewer profile but have not discovered you.
Niche demand signals visible in the other audience that represent content expansion opportunities for your channel.
312 of your superfans actively engage with [Adjacent Channel]'s mechanical deep-dive content — a format you have not explored. These participants comment 3.2× more frequently on technical breakdowns than on narrative content. The adjacent channel's audience includes 4,219 active commenters in this niche who have never engaged with your channel.
"I would kill for a proper breakdown of the technical side of this. Nobody in this space is doing that level of detail."
@Participant_0847 [CORE] · 89 likes · also active on [Adjacent Channel] where technical breakdowns are the top-performing format
Illustrative excerpt. Format and methodology reflect delivered reports. Specific data computed per engagement.
The excerpt above shows roughly 15% of a delivered report. Here is the full table of contents.
Composite health score with sub-indices for fan concentration, engagement quality, retention, and discussion depth. Each sub-index traces to its underlying calculation.
Every participant classified by engagement history into tiers (CORE, ADVOCATE, REGULAR, PASSING). Tier movement tracked across the analysis window.
Every product, course, or service request with explicit purchase intent — quoted, dated, and attributed to a specific participant.
Previously-active high-value participants who went quiet, with the content or event that preceded the silence and a re-engagement score per participant.
Existing public endorsements ranked by social proof weight, with source URLs so each one can be verified before reuse in launch material.
The unbuilt content and product opportunities the audience has already described, ranked by demand signal strength and revenue potential.
Which video formats accumulate engagement over time vs. spike and decay. Drives republishing, packaging, and sponsorship strategy.
A concrete next-steps queue with the evidence behind each one. Not generic advice — decisions backed by your community's own data.
Send your channel and a one-line decision you're trying to make. We'll tell you honestly whether there's enough signal to make the report worth it for you.
Creator reports from $1,497. Enterprise engagements start at $5,000. Both begin with a conversation.